Skip to main content

Research Case Studies

Real-world examples of Claude Code in academic research workflows - from raw data to publication

25 min
2 min read
Updated February 11, 2026

Research Case Studies

See Claude Code in action with complete academic workflows. These aren't toy examples—they're the kinds of tasks that eat up your research time.

Case Study 1: From Raw Data to Publication Figure

Scenario: You have messy field data and need a publication-ready figure for a journal submission deadline.

The Problem

Bash
Raw data: 847 observations across 12 sites
Issues: Mixed date formats, missing values coded differently, outliers
Deadline: Journal submission due in 3 days

The Workflow

Step 1: Assess the mess

Bash
claude "Read data/field_observations.csv and give me a data quality report:
- Missing values by column
- Date format inconsistencies
- Potential outliers
- Any obvious data entry errors"

Claude examines your data and returns:

Bash
Data Quality Report for field_observations.csv:
MISSING VALUES:
- temperature: 23 missing (2.7%)
- salinity: 8 missing (0.9%)
- depth: 0 missing
- species_count: 45 missing (5.3%) ← mostly from Site_07
DATE ISSUES:
- Rows 1-234: MM/DD/YYYY format
- Rows 235-847: YYYY-MM-DD format
- 3 rows have "unknown" as date
OUTLIERS (>3 SD):
- temperature: 2 values (89°C, 91°C) ← likely Fahrenheit not Celsius
- species_count: 1 value (9,847) ← likely typo, check field notes
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Convert temperature outliers: (F-32)*5/9
2. Investigate Site_07 missing species counts
3. Standardize dates to ISO format

Step 2: Clean with audit trail

Bash
claude "Create a cleaning script that:
1. Fixes the issues you identified
2. Logs every change made (row, column, old value, new value)
3. Saves cleaned data with '_cleaned' suffix
4. Generates a cleaning report I can include in supplementary materials
Use pandas. Make it reproducible."

Step 3: Generate the figure

Bash
claude "Create a publication-ready figure showing:
- Species count by site (x-axis) vs temperature (y-axis)
- Color by depth category (shallow/medium/deep)
- Include regression line with 95% CI
- Error bars showing standard error
Style requirements:
- 300 DPI for print
- Sans-serif fonts (Nature style)
- Colorblind-friendly palette
- Panel dimensions: 180mm x 120mm
Save as both PNG and PDF."

Time Comparison

TaskTraditionalWith Claude Code
Data quality assessment45 min3 min
Cleaning script2-3 hours15 min
Publication figure1-2 hours10 min
Total4-5 hours~30 min

Case Study 2: Inheriting a Grad Student's Code

Scenario: Your grad student defended and left. Now you need to re-run their analysis for a follow-up paper. The code "worked on their laptop."

The Problem

  • Code references absolute paths (/Users/alex/Desktop/thesis/...)
  • Missing dependency versions ("it just needs pandas")
  • Cryptic error: KeyError: 'treatment_group'
  • No documentation

The Workflow

Step 1: Forensic analysis

Bash
claude "Analyze the code in legacy_analysis/:
1. List all Python files and their apparent purpose
2. Identify all dependencies being imported
3. Find all hardcoded paths that need updating
4. Identify where 'treatment_group' should come from
5. Create a dependency list with likely version requirements
Be thorough—I need to get this running without the original author."

Step 2: Create reproducible environment

Bash
claude "Based on your analysis:
1. Create a requirements.txt with pinned versions
2. Create a setup script that:
- Sets up a virtual environment
- Installs dependencies
- Creates necessary directories
3. Update all hardcoded paths to use relative paths or config file
4. Add the missing 'treatment_group' column based on the data patterns you see"

Step 3: Document for posterity

Bash
claude "Create documentation for this project:
1. README.md explaining what the analysis does
2. Add docstrings to all functions
3. Create a flowchart of the analysis pipeline
4. Add inline comments for non-obvious code
This needs to be understandable by the next grad student."

Case Study 3: Multi-Author Analysis Integration

Scenario: Three co-authors analyzed different aspects of the same dataset. One used R, one used Python, one used Stata. You need to integrate their results.

The Problem

Bash
Author 1 (R/tidyverse): Descriptive statistics, demographic analysis
Author 2 (Python/statsmodels): Main regression models
Author 3 (Stata): Robustness checks, instrumental variables
All analyzing: survey_data_2024.csv
Output formats: .rds, .pkl, .dta

The Workflow

Step 1: Standardize outputs

Bash
claude "I have analysis outputs in three formats:
- author1_results/ contains .rds files (R)
- author2_results/ contains .pkl files (Python)
- author3_results/ contains .dta files (Stata)
Create a script that:
1. Reads all result files
2. Extracts key statistics (coefficients, SEs, p-values, CIs)
3. Standardizes to a common format
4. Outputs a combined results table
Handle the different statistical object structures appropriately."

Step 2: Create master results table

Bash
claude "Using the standardized results, create:
1. A master regression table (Table 2 format) combining all models
2. Export as:
- LaTeX (for manuscript)
- Word-compatible format (for co-authors who don't use LaTeX)
- CSV (for supplementary materials)
Use APA formatting for statistics."

Step 3: Verify consistency

Bash
claude "Cross-check the three analyses:
1. Do sample sizes match where they should?
2. Are baseline descriptives consistent?
3. Flag any discrepancies between authors' results
4. Create a verification report I can share with co-authors"

Case Study 4: BCO-DMO Data Documentation

Scenario: NSF requires you to submit your data to BCO-DMO. You need comprehensive metadata documentation.

The Workflow

Bash
claude "I need to prepare my dataset for BCO-DMO submission.
Read data/coral_survey_2024.csv and create:
1. A data dictionary with:
- Variable names
- Data types
- Units
- Allowed values/ranges
- Missing value codes
- Collection methods (I'll fill these in)
2. Methods documentation covering:
- Sampling design
- Data collection protocols
- Quality control procedures
- Known limitations
3. A README following BCO-DMO guidelines
Format everything in their required template structure."

Quick Reference: Research Prompts That Work

Data Cleaning

Bash
"Read [file] and identify data quality issues. For each issue, suggest a fix and explain the tradeoff."

Statistical Analysis

Bash
"Run [specific test] on [variables] and interpret the results as I would for a Methods section. Include effect sizes."

Visualization

Bash
"Create a [plot type] suitable for [journal]. Use [specific style guide] formatting. Make it colorblind-accessible."

Code Documentation

Bash
"Add documentation to [file] that would let a new grad student understand and modify it. Include example usage."

What These Cases Have in Common

  1. Real deadlines — Not "exploring data for fun" but "paper submission due Friday"
  2. Messy inputs — Data and code are never as clean as tutorials assume
  3. Audit trails — Academic work requires documentation of every decision
  4. Multiple formats — Journals want LaTeX, co-authors want Word, repos want Markdown
  5. Reproducibility — Someone else needs to run this code in 5 years

Next Steps

Share this article