Research Case Studies
Real-world examples of Claude Code in academic research workflows - from raw data to publication
See Claude Code in action with complete academic workflows. These aren't toy examples—they're the kinds of tasks that eat up your research time.
Case Study 1: From Raw Data to Publication Figure
Scenario: You have messy field data and need a publication-ready figure for a journal submission deadline.
The Problem
Raw data: 847 observations across 12 sitesIssues: Mixed date formats, missing values coded differently, outliersDeadline: Journal submission due in 3 daysThe Workflow
Step 1: Assess the mess
claude "Read data/field_observations.csv and give me a data quality report:- Missing values by column- Date format inconsistencies- Potential outliers- Any obvious data entry errors"Claude examines your data and returns:
Data Quality Report for field_observations.csv: MISSING VALUES:- temperature: 23 missing (2.7%)- salinity: 8 missing (0.9%)- depth: 0 missing- species_count: 45 missing (5.3%) ← mostly from Site_07 DATE ISSUES:- Rows 1-234: MM/DD/YYYY format- Rows 235-847: YYYY-MM-DD format- 3 rows have "unknown" as date OUTLIERS (>3 SD):- temperature: 2 values (89°C, 91°C) ← likely Fahrenheit not Celsius- species_count: 1 value (9,847) ← likely typo, check field notes RECOMMENDATIONS:1. Convert temperature outliers: (F-32)*5/92. Investigate Site_07 missing species counts3. Standardize dates to ISO formatStep 2: Clean with audit trail
claude "Create a cleaning script that:1. Fixes the issues you identified2. Logs every change made (row, column, old value, new value)3. Saves cleaned data with '_cleaned' suffix4. Generates a cleaning report I can include in supplementary materials Use pandas. Make it reproducible."Step 3: Generate the figure
claude "Create a publication-ready figure showing:- Species count by site (x-axis) vs temperature (y-axis)- Color by depth category (shallow/medium/deep)- Include regression line with 95% CI- Error bars showing standard error Style requirements:- 300 DPI for print- Sans-serif fonts (Nature style)- Colorblind-friendly palette- Panel dimensions: 180mm x 120mm Save as both PNG and PDF."Time Comparison
| Task | Traditional | With Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Data quality assessment | 45 min | 3 min |
| Cleaning script | 2-3 hours | 15 min |
| Publication figure | 1-2 hours | 10 min |
| Total | 4-5 hours | ~30 min |
Case Study 2: Inheriting a Grad Student's Code
Scenario: Your grad student defended and left. Now you need to re-run their analysis for a follow-up paper. The code "worked on their laptop."
The Problem
- Code references absolute paths (
/Users/alex/Desktop/thesis/...) - Missing dependency versions ("it just needs pandas")
- Cryptic error:
KeyError: 'treatment_group' - No documentation
The Workflow
Step 1: Forensic analysis
claude "Analyze the code in legacy_analysis/:1. List all Python files and their apparent purpose2. Identify all dependencies being imported3. Find all hardcoded paths that need updating4. Identify where 'treatment_group' should come from5. Create a dependency list with likely version requirements Be thorough—I need to get this running without the original author."Step 2: Create reproducible environment
claude "Based on your analysis:1. Create a requirements.txt with pinned versions2. Create a setup script that: - Sets up a virtual environment - Installs dependencies - Creates necessary directories3. Update all hardcoded paths to use relative paths or config file4. Add the missing 'treatment_group' column based on the data patterns you see"Step 3: Document for posterity
claude "Create documentation for this project:1. README.md explaining what the analysis does2. Add docstrings to all functions3. Create a flowchart of the analysis pipeline4. Add inline comments for non-obvious code This needs to be understandable by the next grad student."Case Study 3: Multi-Author Analysis Integration
Scenario: Three co-authors analyzed different aspects of the same dataset. One used R, one used Python, one used Stata. You need to integrate their results.
The Problem
Author 1 (R/tidyverse): Descriptive statistics, demographic analysisAuthor 2 (Python/statsmodels): Main regression modelsAuthor 3 (Stata): Robustness checks, instrumental variables All analyzing: survey_data_2024.csvOutput formats: .rds, .pkl, .dtaThe Workflow
Step 1: Standardize outputs
claude "I have analysis outputs in three formats:- author1_results/ contains .rds files (R)- author2_results/ contains .pkl files (Python)- author3_results/ contains .dta files (Stata) Create a script that:1. Reads all result files2. Extracts key statistics (coefficients, SEs, p-values, CIs)3. Standardizes to a common format4. Outputs a combined results table Handle the different statistical object structures appropriately."Step 2: Create master results table
claude "Using the standardized results, create:1. A master regression table (Table 2 format) combining all models2. Export as: - LaTeX (for manuscript) - Word-compatible format (for co-authors who don't use LaTeX) - CSV (for supplementary materials) Use APA formatting for statistics."Step 3: Verify consistency
claude "Cross-check the three analyses:1. Do sample sizes match where they should?2. Are baseline descriptives consistent?3. Flag any discrepancies between authors' results4. Create a verification report I can share with co-authors"Case Study 4: BCO-DMO Data Documentation
Scenario: NSF requires you to submit your data to BCO-DMO. You need comprehensive metadata documentation.
The Workflow
claude "I need to prepare my dataset for BCO-DMO submission. Read data/coral_survey_2024.csv and create: 1. A data dictionary with: - Variable names - Data types - Units - Allowed values/ranges - Missing value codes - Collection methods (I'll fill these in) 2. Methods documentation covering: - Sampling design - Data collection protocols - Quality control procedures - Known limitations 3. A README following BCO-DMO guidelines Format everything in their required template structure."Quick Reference: Research Prompts That Work
Data Cleaning
"Read [file] and identify data quality issues. For each issue, suggest a fix and explain the tradeoff."Statistical Analysis
"Run [specific test] on [variables] and interpret the results as I would for a Methods section. Include effect sizes."Visualization
"Create a [plot type] suitable for [journal]. Use [specific style guide] formatting. Make it colorblind-accessible."Code Documentation
"Add documentation to [file] that would let a new grad student understand and modify it. Include example usage."What These Cases Have in Common
- Real deadlines — Not "exploring data for fun" but "paper submission due Friday"
- Messy inputs — Data and code are never as clean as tutorials assume
- Audit trails — Academic work requires documentation of every decision
- Multiple formats — Journals want LaTeX, co-authors want Word, repos want Markdown
- Reproducibility — Someone else needs to run this code in 5 years
Next Steps
- Research Limitations & When Not to Use Claude Code — Honest assessment for skeptical PIs
- Collaboration Workflows — Working with co-authors and students
- First 30 Minutes Exercise — Try it with your own data